Jet fuel... EXPLODES.Originally posted by FuLa@Sep 1 2006, 08:31 PM
I think that loose change is bullshit but they do bring up some important points...for example the explosions in the towers..cnn, abc, nbc,....every news reporter at the spot was saying "we're hearing explosions"....and we haven't heard anything official except for bullshit excuses that don't make sence...
also the part where they show other buildings in history which have burned for hours and hours and had 1/5000th the size and structure/stability of the twin towers...
third...what would bush's presidency be without these attacks?....NOTHING...0000....that's pretty interesting, he hasn't dealt with any other issue but war and terrorism in his whole term. so his presidency pretty much is based upon a terrorist attack.
Ever hear a building or house fall? Also sounds like at explosion, or when metal or concrete is twisted under the weight+heat factor.
As for the design... The WTT where flawed, the firewall was too thin and couldnt withstand the temperature of a generalized fire... specially not one backed by jet fuel. And you might not remember... but the towers actuall stayed standing a fucking long time concidering a plane rammed into it. Have any idea what kind of structural stress that puts on the whole building? People inside witnessed that the whole tower seemed to sway slightly when it hit. Now even swaying it a cm is enough to do an incredible amount of damage.
Might be nothing as you say. So?
That doesnt mean anything AT ALL. THere would be less business in the tourism departement around 9/11 if it wasnt for all the people that want to visit the ruins. So does that mean the tourist dudes decided to topple a tower to make more money? See how idiotic your statement sounds? He took advantage of an occurance, doesnt mean in any way that he caused it.