exacly, thats why it would have been impressive, but it was legal, which completely kills the point. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by JadedSketches+Apr 30 2006, 02:10 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JadedSketches @ Apr 30 2006, 02:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>@Apr 29 2006, 04:07 PM
If you go to www.stillfree.com its mark ecko's site and at the bottom of the page and click on the legal disclaimer thing it says in there that "the video does not depict a real event"
I think that is really lame that he does that what a goon <_<
He was making a point, I personally, even though it was fake, see it as kinda cool, but he should have bombed the entire plane.
Who gives a fuck what you think? Do you have any idea how hard it would be to get within 100 feet of the AF One plane? Let alone, paint it, and put it on video.
Well, I'll give you that. But until it was known that it was legal, people were freaking the fuck out. He got the reaction he wanted.