They will do prints if they get a positive id on you and you left something behind like a can. But no, they aren't going to do csi style run the print through an FBI database lol.
Refuse on Teenagers from Uranus was talking about getting roped and getting a prison sentence because of finger prints.
ok, if you have a slap on every corner of every street on every sign pole in your state, then you MIGHT get roped for prints. be smart.
I wouldn't say you'd get roped at all for stickers, look at BNE. If you are straight up destroying shit on the reg, and you live in a well off state, you MIGHT get caught for prints if you leave a can/ lid behind.
really, i dont see the point in vandalism. thats the only think i dont like about the general idea of graffiti. like, im cool with bombin shit, but i hate people that just disrespect property by leaving behind trash and breaking their shit.
How so? Unless you're doing a scratchie or using etch, I don't really see how it could be considered vandalism. Paint is a protective surface. That wall is better off having that paint on it.
because, theres a difference between decorating a city with art, replacing a boring wall with colors, and straight up destroying property.
hahahaha... So going with that train of thought, if I came over to your house and dropped a bunch of GD pitchforks and shit, you'd thanks me for the "protective" coat of paint? Nice try tho dude. I lol'd.
What? Could you perhaps reiterate what you just said? Your typing is atrocious and quite frankly it makes me want to punch a baby.
word.cezr's got it right.just becuase its not as desructive as lets say throwing a rock through someones window but its still vandalism.your putting something on someone elses shit without their permission and they have the right to keep their walls and such "boring" as you put it.and when you put something up on it you destroy that wall in a sense.its vandalism and theres a reason its illegal.now,does that mean that i care??? no.i really dont.but its still vandalism no matter how artistic or pretty that shit is.
basicly what you deem art is to another person vandalism, especially when its their shit. not everyone wants your 'dope piece' on there store or truck or whatever you decide to bomb.
That wasn't particularly my point and I also understand your opinions on the matter. This debate has surely been had before and there are many good points on either side. In truth it doesn't matter very much and I just felt like being a jerk.
its been said before. nobody ever asked my permission before they put huge coporate buildings up. why should i care what they think. im just saying, destroying pointlessly is stupid.
Well, if you are painting to stick it to the big corporate buildings, I would say firebombing is just as productive, if not more.