First of all any fool can clearly see this is a portrait of Dali- NOT Picasso. I would have given you partial credit if the style even remotely resembled Cubism, but being obvious that it isn't and not to mention that Dali was only 2 years old during that period- I award you no points (yes I am aware Picasso did later contribute to surrealism but that’s beside the point). Second of all, how exactly does the Opera “Pagliacci“ have any influence on a portrait of Salvador Dali? The only real clown and waste of space around here is you. My guess GeSus, (this is a shot in the dark but) it’s PEST because of his trademark designs to the right and what appears to be a PE emerging off to the side in the first photo. The weird tag at the bottom makes me think otherwise.
that would make sence i didnt even notice the lil squiggles, the eye drips are a nice touch though but chuch...
i have seen it all now. [Broken External Image]:http://www.12ozprophet.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=73681&stc=1&d=1194334519 yo gesus check this one out!!!!!! the real hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
i did the dali and an einstein on the other side....they both changed our notion of time....pest DID do his trademark squiggles and designs in between the two portraits....there weren't any obvious influences that i could think of.....i did both portraits in almost pitch dark and they took me about 30 minutes each to complete