I'm working on an article about graffiti and really want to get the perspective of taggers and bombers on That Question about vandalism. The whole "graffiti as street art" thing is controversial but relatively straightforward when it comes to pieces but I want to hear what taggers and bombers think, especially about work on things like old buildings, monuments etc. Why do you personally do it? Is it antisocial / vandalism? If it is, why do it? If not, why not? Sorry to spam your forum, but I'm not sure where else to ask. My editor is pushing for the whole "graffiti can be urban art but tagging is just dogs pissing on lampposts" angle, like every other bloody graff article out there, but that's lazy af. Please help, even if it's just a couple sentences!