By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Discussion in 'Picture gallery' started by Fube, Dec 20, 2007.
I like it j.
really depends what you want to do with photography. If you want to make money by shooting for clients often, digital is the way to go unless you're rich. If you just want to shoot for yourself or maybe sell some prints, film is alright. looks mad good, but digital is more efficient if you are shooting in high volume.
word thnx AK.. i will look into the tokina and the 50 1.8 sometime soon
Saw an old lady walking around with a Bessa and a 50 f/1.1... I bugged the fuck out. She must have been a veteran photographer... probably famous.
And yeah we stay fresh.
Help me decide peoples... even though the only guy that knew about medium format has left. Whatever happened to that fulla?
[Broken External Image]:http://www.savak.net/ebay/100601/330f/P1170285.JPG
[Broken External Image]:http://i696.photobucket.com/albums/vv327/camorama/_DSC0731.jpg
I can't decide.
i would go with the 645 personally.
Gonna go with the mamiya C220, slightly lighter than the C330. The M645 is only 6x4.5 I want 6x6 square shots.
[Broken External Image]:http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/6603/31963403250839276510704.jpg
i really like this... it could be an ad for hanes haha.
the c220 or c330 both look dope so go with one of those...
im leaning more towards the voigtlander cause i never shoot digi. plus once that grad money starts rolling in it should be affordable.
and i remember this other guy was talking about medium format pretty recently, i think it was robbie p?
i was talking about it a bit ago too.
channa, it looks like you missed focus a bit.
Channa, that last one looks slightly outta focus
I have a Sigma 28-70mm f2.8-4 DG lens (Canon Mount)
I want to get rid of it
ver nice how mach
EDIT : Lens Sold.
I'd go for the 645 myself, but, the c330 is pretty sweet too, and it shoots squares.
What are the prices like on those?
im already getting rid of my 2 week old Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 EX DC Macro...gonna replace it with Sigma's new 17-70 f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM
constant 2.8 is nice but i think id rather have the OS(optical stabilization), HSM, and the added focal length
Canon 35mm f/2.0 is already in order along with the sigma. id probably use that more for walk around
just bought a little manfrotto pistol grip ball head tripod today(been wanting one that i can fit in the backpack)
and a macbook next week so i can finally have the patience to edit and post more
I'd go with the 645, AK.
Yeah damn I noticed that out of focus shit too. Well hopefully its not too bad that the client will notice because I don't give refunds!
Separate names with a comma.