taking promos for these dudes http://www.myspace.com/oceano stoked. time to blow up ..real big band in my genre
got my canon p in the mail, it looks like its in great condition, all the shutter speeds work, etc. ak, graduated nd filter on that second pic?
she asked me to get her her laptop. lmao yeah, i got as close to the shit as possible with still getting the shot i wanted, and i was shooting on F3.5. but i thought that i heard that if you zoomed in, you would get less depth of field? and the white balance was on point in the original, but i messed with the saturation contrast and brightness afterword.
Zio- most protection plans are crap to be honest. where I work, the protection plan covers just about everything but loss and theft. It's not the cheapest, but you are covered for 4 years and it's cheaper than buying a new camera if you drop it. Manufacturers only really cover things if it's their fault. Shifted- Awesome job landing Oceano dude. Kringe- gimme a few and I will post some shit showing what i mean about zooming. what lens/camera are you using?
Yeah on all the exterior photos. Gonna come back in the morning when the sun is rising on the front of the building.
Your right. Except with the kit lenses as you zoom in, the aperture goes down from 3.5 to 5.6. This is why pro's use constant f/2.8 or lower telephotos.
definitely re-shoot that first one with better light. the second one the lighting isn't too bad, but could maybe use some fill on the wall on the right and I would play around with the crop a little bit, the interior looks nice. which lens did you end up getting?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-mAMH5S6VA not photography related; not really graffiti related either. but this is the thread ive posted in the most so i thought i'd share here..pretty dope emcee. i helped that okami guy out ..pretty cool seeing a writer you know in a video haha =p on a side note, getting my d80 tomorrow and probably a nikkor AF 50 mm 1.4d
Anyone know how the fook people get photos to look like this? Im assuming they lower the saturation or vibrance or something....i thought mayeb they lower the contrast as well but the photos are too contrasty etc....any help will be appreciated [Broken External Image]:http://www.site-photography.co.uk/front angle.jpg [Broken External Image]:http://www.site-photography.co.uk/front.jpg